Ohio_Patient_Network

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Welcome to the Ohio Patient Network

Veterans Affairs OK's use of Medical Marijuana

E-mail Print PDF

The federal Department of Veteran Affairs, in a breakthru move, will now allow it's doctors and hospitals to use marijuana in the treatment of veterans in states with medical marijuana laws.  The change originated with a letter to Michael Krawitz, executive director of Veterans for Medical Marijuana Access.  The key importance of this change, according to Krawitz, is that the use of marijuana "...will not be the basis for the denial of services.”  Here in Ohio some VA centers already permit the use of marijuana for their veteran patients, while others have denied medical care.  Hopefully, this will encourage Ohio VA doctors and hospitals to be more compassionate in their treatment of our veterans.

Below is the story from the New York Times

NY Times: V.A. Easing Rules for Users of Medical Marijuana
By DAN FROSCH
Published: July 23, 2010

DENVER ­ The Department of Veterans Affairs will formally allow patients treated at its hospitals and clinics to use medical marijuana in states where it is legal, a policy clarification that veterans have sought for several years.

A department directive, expected to take effect next week, resolves the conflict in veterans facilities between federal law, which outlaws marijuana, and the 14 states that allow medicinal use of the drug, effectively deferring to the states.

The policy will not permit department doctors to prescribe marijuana. But it will address the concern of many patients who use it that they could lose access to their prescription pain medication if caught.

Such fear has led many patients to distrust their doctors, veterans say. With doctors and patients pressing the veterans department for formal guidance, agency officials began drafting a policy last fall.

“When states start legalizing marijuana we are put in a bit of a unique position because as a federal agency, we are beholden to federal law,” said Dr. Robert Jesse, the principal deputy under secretary for health in the Veterans Department.

At the same time, Dr. Jesse said, “We didn’t want patients who were legally using marijuana to be administratively denied access to pain management programs.”

The new policy applies only to veterans using medical marijuana in states where it is legal. Doctors may still modify a veteran’s treatment plan if the veteran is using marijuana, or decide not to prescribe pain medicine altogether if there is a risk of a drug interaction. But that decision will be made on a case-by-case basis, not as blanket policy, Dr. Jesse said.

Though veterans of the Vietnam War were the first group to use marijuana widely for medical purposes, the population of veterans using it now spans generations, said Michael Krawitz, executive director of Veterans for Medical Marijuana Access, which worked with the Veterans Department on formulating a policy.

Veterans, some of whom have been at the forefront of the medical marijuana movement, praised the new policy. They say cannabis helps sooth physical and psychological pain and can alleviate the side effects of some treatments.

“By creating a directive on medical marijuana, the V.A. ensures that throughout its vast hospital network, it will be well understood that legal medical marijuana use will not be the basis for the denial of services,” Mr. Krawitz said.

Last Updated on Sunday, 25 July 2010 02:54 Read more...
 

Maine, Other States, Approve Licenses For Medical Marijuana Distribution Centers

E-mail Print PDF

Augusta, ME: State health officials have approved proprietors for six of the state's eight authorized medical marijuana dispensaries.

According to local news reports, three non-profit corporations have been chosen to operate the six facilities. One of the groups, the Northeast Patients Group, was selected to establish four of the six facilities. The Northeast patients Group is associated with the Berkeley Patients Group, a prominent California medical cannabis dispensary.

State health department officials received proposals to operate dispensaries from over two-dozen applicants.

The state declined to name operators in the two remaining health districts. Applications for those two regions will be reopened later this summer.

In April, state lawmakers enacted legislation authorizing the creation of up to eight nonprofit medical cannabis dispensaries – one for each of the state's public health districts. Under the measure, dispensaries may legally "acquire, possess, cultivate, manufacture, deliver, transfer, transport, sell, supply or dispenses marijuana or related supplies and educational materials" to state-authorized medical marijuana patients. Maine citizens approved the creation of state-licensed dispensaries in a statewide vote last November.

Lawmakers in Colorado, New Jersey, New Mexico, Rhode Island, and Washington, DC have also enacted regulations overseeing the production and distribution of marijuana. However, to date only health officials in New Mexico have licensed proprietors to legally produce and dispense marijuana to qualified patients.

In Rhode Island, health officials are in the final process of deciding which among 15 applicants will receive state authorization to produce and dispense marijuana to the state's 1,800 registered patients.

 

Huffington Post: "Why Marijuana Is Not A Drug"

E-mail Print PDF

Forty years ago this fall, marijuana was classified a Schedule I Controlled Substance, along with ecstasy, LSD, and heroin. The qualifications required for a drug to reach such an esteemed distinction are threefold: 1. High potential for abuse, 2. No currently accepted medical use, and 3. Lack of accepted safety for use. Additionally, Schedule I drugs are broken down into four categories; and yes, THC - the primary active chemical in marijuana - is listed under "psychedelic substances".

This November, days after the 40th anniversary of one of the most bizarre prohibitions in US history, California voters will have the opportunity to decriminalize once and for all the possession and recreational usage of what we now know to be a perfectly harmless, naturally-occurring crop. And right as many are to champion this measure finally making its way to a ballot, there is no cause yet to celebrate. A message war is about to heat up, much as it did in the same state in 2008 over same sex marriage. Hopefully, advocates will have learned two truths by now from last time around: the right will lie unabashedly, and elected Democrats will be largely silent and unhelpful.

This makes it more crucial than ever for advocates to be on the offensive.

One of the enduring treasures of American liberty is that we do not demand a reason to make something legal - the burden is on showing why something ought to be illegal. As usual, Gore Vidal put it succinctly: "It might be good for our citizens to recall (or learn for the first time) that the United States was the creation of men who believed that each man has the right to do what he wants with his own life as long as he does not interfere with his neighbor's pursuit of happiness."

So as a first offensive play, let's point the finger at those who oppose this measure and demand they explain themselves. Why has smoking something in private been judged a criminal activity? And does pot truly meet the requirements of a Schedule I drug?

1. High potential for abuse? Hardly: while upwards of 42% of American adults have smoked marijuana at least once in their life, less than 1% smoke it on a daily basis. And whereas alcohol is linked to over 75,000 deaths per year, and cigarettes roughly 400,000 per year, the world is still waiting for the first-ever instance of marijuana fatality. This is a drug on which it is impossible to overdose.

Last Updated on Sunday, 30 May 2010 20:06 Read more...
 

Marijuana Arrests Continue To Drive Drug ‘Treatment’ Boom

E-mail Print PDF

Nearly six out of ten people admitted to drug ‘treatment’ for marijuana are referred there by the criminal justice system, according to a just-released report by the US Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Association (SAMHSA).

In 2008, 57 percent of persons referred to treatment for marijuana as their ‘primary substance of abuse,’ were referred by the criminal justice system. For adolescents, nearly half (48 percent) were referred via the criminal justice system.

By contrast, criminal justice referrals accounted for just 37 percent of the overall total of drug treatment admissions in 2008.

“Primary marijuana admissions were less likely than all admissions combined to be self-referred to treatment,” the study found.

Since 1998 the percentage of individuals in drug treatment primarily for marijuana has risen approximately 25 percent, the report found. This increase is being primarily driven by a proportional rise in the percentage of criminal justice referrals. According to a previous federal study, the proportion of marijuana treatment admissions from all sources other than the criminal justice system has been declining since the mid-1990s.

Commenting on the study, NORML Deputy Director Paul Armentano said: “These statistics make it clear that it is not marijuana use per se that is driving these treatment admission rates; it is marijuana prohibition that is primarily responsible. These people for the most part are not ‘addicts’ in any true sense of the word. Rather, they are ordinary Americans who have experienced the misfortune of being busted for marijuana who are forced to choose between rehab or jail.”

According to federal figures compiled by SAMHSA in 2009, some 37 percent of the estimated 288,000 thousand people who entered drug treatment for cannabis in 2007 had not reported using it in the 30 days previous to their admission. Another 16 percent of those admitted said that they’d used marijuana three times or fewer in the month prior to their admission.

Last Updated on Sunday, 30 May 2010 19:54
 

Veterans Deserve Medicine That Works

E-mail Print PDF

Last year clinical trials on the efficacy of medical marijuana were completed at the University of California at San Diego. The results of these gold standard trials showed that marijuana is effective in reducing muscle spasms associated with multiple sclerosis and relieving pain caused by neurological injuries or illness, (neuropathic pain).

There is also a huge body of colloquial evidence among Veterans that marijuana is also effective in treating Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. These are exactly the kinds of conditions suffered most by Veterans who have experienced lifetime disabling injuries to body and mind as a result of their service. I have had numerous veterans tell me that when they tried marijuana for their PTSD, they experienced their first decent nights sleep in years.

Those who use it for chronic pain report needing only a minimum of traditional pain meds at bedtime and no tolerance buildup when supplementing traditional pain medicine with marijuana. This minimizes the chance of addiction to traditional pain medicine as many times occurs when treating chronic pain with opioid medicines alone. The success of using medical marijuana to treat these types of conditions is solid and unquestionable. The Veterans Administration should be allowed to prescribe medical marijuana to it’s patients and should provide it thru the VA pharmacy system.

There is no doubt in any reasonable person’s mind that the war on marijuana is a failure. Today, despite the propaganda efforts of the government, we know that marijuana is not the dangerous, useless drug it has been claimed to be, but effective medicine with a safety record better than aspirin, Rolaids and most medicines sold over the counter.

Currently the government allows the use of medical marijuana in states that have medical marijuana laws. So, what is the governments reason for not allowing Disabled Veterans, it’s most deserving citizens, to use medical marijuana? In order for the government to allow it’s Veterans to use medical marijuana it would have to admit that it was wrong. It would have to admit that marijuana prohibition was a mistake.

One can only conclude that the failed forty year war on marijuana users is more important to the Federal Government than the suffering of those permanently injured while standing the wall of freedom. As witnessed by the 2010 Drug War budget, they would rather pour money into a failed policy than admit the policy is wrong. This is a course of action that was not expected of this administration and certainly not change our Veterans can believe in.


Master Sergeant Tony Vance is a retired 20 year Air Force veteran who is a regular contributor the the editorial pages of the Cincinnati Enquirer.  You can read and comment on his article on the Cincinnati Enquirer website.

Last Updated on Monday, 17 May 2010 12:46
 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  7 
  •  8 
  •  9 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »


Page 1 of 9

Polls

Marijuana Poll
 

Login Form

Statistics

Content View Hits : 68408

Medical Marijuana News

Maternal Tobacco and Alcohol Use, But Not Marijuana, Associated With Psychotic Symptoms In Offspring, Study Says

Wales, United Kingdom: The maternal use of tobacco and alcohol during pregnancy is linked with increased incidences of psychotic symptoms in adolescents, according to the results of a longitudinal study published in the October issue of The British Journal of Psychiatry.

Investigators at the University of Bristol in Great Britain assessed whether maternal use of tobacco, alcohol, or cannabis during pregnancy increased the risk of psychotic symptoms in their offspring. Researchers examined the drug use habits of the mothers of over 6,300 adolescents – approximately 12 percent of which exhibited some symptoms of psychosis.

Authors concluded: "Frequency of maternal tobacco use during pregnancy was associated with increased risk of suspect or definite psychotic symptoms (in offspring.) Maternal alcohol use shows a non-linear association with psychotic symptoms, with this effect almost exclusively in the offspring of women drinking >21 units (approximately a half-pint of beer or a glass of wine) weekly. Maternal cannabis was not associated with psychotic symptoms."

For more information, please contact Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director, at: paul@norml.org. Full text of the study, "Maternal tobacco, cannabis and alcohol use during pregnancy and risk of adolescent psychotic symptoms in offspring," appears in the British Journal of Psychiatry.