Ohio_Patient_Network

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Welcome to the Ohio Patient Network

Sting Advocates for Health-Based Drug Policies

E-mail Print PDF

Sting, the internationally renowned musician and activist, is teaming up with the Drug Policy Alliance to call for an end to the failed war on drugs. Sting has written a passionate letter laying out the devastating consequences of the drug war and urging people to support the Drug Policy Alliance in advocating for sane drug polices.

"The War on Drugs has failed—but it’s worse than that. It is actively harming our society. Violent crime is thriving in the shadows to which the drug trade has been consigned. People who genuinely need help can’t get it. Neither can people who need medical marijuana to treat terrible diseases. We are spending billions, filling up our prisons with non-violent offenders and sacrificing our liberties."

Sting explains how he came across the Drug Policy Alliance (DPA) after reading an opinion piece by its executive director, Ethan Nadelmann, in the Wall Street Journal about the failures of drug prohibition. Ethan’s article "dared to say in print—in a thoughtful, meticulous argument—what everyone who has seriously looked at the issue has known for years: the War on Drugs is an absolute failure whose cost to society is increasingly unbearable and absolutely unjustifiable."

DPA will be using Sting’s letter to recruit new members. Sting follows in the footsteps of long time DPA supporter Walter Cronkite, the legendary newsman who passed away late last year.

"I am absolutely thrilled that Sting has agreed to join with DPA in advocating for an end to the drug war," said Ethan Nadelmann.  "Sting is taking leadership on this important issue and we know it will inspire others to speak out and get involved."

In addition to writing the letter, Sting has also become a member of the honorary board of the Drug Policy Alliance. He joins other DPA honorary board members including former secretary of state George P. Shultz, Arianna Huffington, Russell Simmons, former president of the Czech Republic Václav Havel, and other prominent public advocates for drug policy reform.


Contact Ohio Patient Network at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it to see what you can do to end the medical marijuana prohibition.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 03 August 2010 10:57
 

Veterans Affairs OK's use of Medical Marijuana

E-mail Print PDF

The federal Department of Veteran Affairs, in a breakthru move, will now allow it's doctors and hospitals to use marijuana in the treatment of veterans in states with medical marijuana laws.  The change originated with a letter to Michael Krawitz, executive director of Veterans for Medical Marijuana Access.  The key importance of this change, according to Krawitz, is that the use of marijuana "...will not be the basis for the denial of services.”  Here in Ohio some VA centers already permit the use of marijuana for their veteran patients, while others have denied medical care.  Hopefully, this will encourage Ohio VA doctors and hospitals to be more compassionate in their treatment of our veterans.

Below is the story from the New York Times

NY Times: V.A. Easing Rules for Users of Medical Marijuana
By DAN FROSCH
Published: July 23, 2010

DENVER ­ The Department of Veterans Affairs will formally allow patients treated at its hospitals and clinics to use medical marijuana in states where it is legal, a policy clarification that veterans have sought for several years.

A department directive, expected to take effect next week, resolves the conflict in veterans facilities between federal law, which outlaws marijuana, and the 14 states that allow medicinal use of the drug, effectively deferring to the states.

The policy will not permit department doctors to prescribe marijuana. But it will address the concern of many patients who use it that they could lose access to their prescription pain medication if caught.

Such fear has led many patients to distrust their doctors, veterans say. With doctors and patients pressing the veterans department for formal guidance, agency officials began drafting a policy last fall.

“When states start legalizing marijuana we are put in a bit of a unique position because as a federal agency, we are beholden to federal law,” said Dr. Robert Jesse, the principal deputy under secretary for health in the Veterans Department.

At the same time, Dr. Jesse said, “We didn’t want patients who were legally using marijuana to be administratively denied access to pain management programs.”

The new policy applies only to veterans using medical marijuana in states where it is legal. Doctors may still modify a veteran’s treatment plan if the veteran is using marijuana, or decide not to prescribe pain medicine altogether if there is a risk of a drug interaction. But that decision will be made on a case-by-case basis, not as blanket policy, Dr. Jesse said.

Though veterans of the Vietnam War were the first group to use marijuana widely for medical purposes, the population of veterans using it now spans generations, said Michael Krawitz, executive director of Veterans for Medical Marijuana Access, which worked with the Veterans Department on formulating a policy.

Veterans, some of whom have been at the forefront of the medical marijuana movement, praised the new policy. They say cannabis helps sooth physical and psychological pain and can alleviate the side effects of some treatments.

“By creating a directive on medical marijuana, the V.A. ensures that throughout its vast hospital network, it will be well understood that legal medical marijuana use will not be the basis for the denial of services,” Mr. Krawitz said.

Last Updated on Sunday, 25 July 2010 02:54 Read more...
 

Marijuana Arrests Continue To Drive Drug ‘Treatment’ Boom

E-mail Print PDF

Nearly six out of ten people admitted to drug ‘treatment’ for marijuana are referred there by the criminal justice system, according to a just-released report by the US Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Association (SAMHSA).

In 2008, 57 percent of persons referred to treatment for marijuana as their ‘primary substance of abuse,’ were referred by the criminal justice system. For adolescents, nearly half (48 percent) were referred via the criminal justice system.

By contrast, criminal justice referrals accounted for just 37 percent of the overall total of drug treatment admissions in 2008.

“Primary marijuana admissions were less likely than all admissions combined to be self-referred to treatment,” the study found.

Since 1998 the percentage of individuals in drug treatment primarily for marijuana has risen approximately 25 percent, the report found. This increase is being primarily driven by a proportional rise in the percentage of criminal justice referrals. According to a previous federal study, the proportion of marijuana treatment admissions from all sources other than the criminal justice system has been declining since the mid-1990s.

Commenting on the study, NORML Deputy Director Paul Armentano said: “These statistics make it clear that it is not marijuana use per se that is driving these treatment admission rates; it is marijuana prohibition that is primarily responsible. These people for the most part are not ‘addicts’ in any true sense of the word. Rather, they are ordinary Americans who have experienced the misfortune of being busted for marijuana who are forced to choose between rehab or jail.”

According to federal figures compiled by SAMHSA in 2009, some 37 percent of the estimated 288,000 thousand people who entered drug treatment for cannabis in 2007 had not reported using it in the 30 days previous to their admission. Another 16 percent of those admitted said that they’d used marijuana three times or fewer in the month prior to their admission.

Last Updated on Sunday, 30 May 2010 19:54
 

Maine, Other States, Approve Licenses For Medical Marijuana Distribution Centers

E-mail Print PDF

Augusta, ME: State health officials have approved proprietors for six of the state's eight authorized medical marijuana dispensaries.

According to local news reports, three non-profit corporations have been chosen to operate the six facilities. One of the groups, the Northeast Patients Group, was selected to establish four of the six facilities. The Northeast patients Group is associated with the Berkeley Patients Group, a prominent California medical cannabis dispensary.

State health department officials received proposals to operate dispensaries from over two-dozen applicants.

The state declined to name operators in the two remaining health districts. Applications for those two regions will be reopened later this summer.

In April, state lawmakers enacted legislation authorizing the creation of up to eight nonprofit medical cannabis dispensaries – one for each of the state's public health districts. Under the measure, dispensaries may legally "acquire, possess, cultivate, manufacture, deliver, transfer, transport, sell, supply or dispenses marijuana or related supplies and educational materials" to state-authorized medical marijuana patients. Maine citizens approved the creation of state-licensed dispensaries in a statewide vote last November.

Lawmakers in Colorado, New Jersey, New Mexico, Rhode Island, and Washington, DC have also enacted regulations overseeing the production and distribution of marijuana. However, to date only health officials in New Mexico have licensed proprietors to legally produce and dispense marijuana to qualified patients.

In Rhode Island, health officials are in the final process of deciding which among 15 applicants will receive state authorization to produce and dispense marijuana to the state's 1,800 registered patients.

 

Huffington Post: "Why Marijuana Is Not A Drug"

E-mail Print PDF

Forty years ago this fall, marijuana was classified a Schedule I Controlled Substance, along with ecstasy, LSD, and heroin. The qualifications required for a drug to reach such an esteemed distinction are threefold: 1. High potential for abuse, 2. No currently accepted medical use, and 3. Lack of accepted safety for use. Additionally, Schedule I drugs are broken down into four categories; and yes, THC - the primary active chemical in marijuana - is listed under "psychedelic substances".

This November, days after the 40th anniversary of one of the most bizarre prohibitions in US history, California voters will have the opportunity to decriminalize once and for all the possession and recreational usage of what we now know to be a perfectly harmless, naturally-occurring crop. And right as many are to champion this measure finally making its way to a ballot, there is no cause yet to celebrate. A message war is about to heat up, much as it did in the same state in 2008 over same sex marriage. Hopefully, advocates will have learned two truths by now from last time around: the right will lie unabashedly, and elected Democrats will be largely silent and unhelpful.

This makes it more crucial than ever for advocates to be on the offensive.

One of the enduring treasures of American liberty is that we do not demand a reason to make something legal - the burden is on showing why something ought to be illegal. As usual, Gore Vidal put it succinctly: "It might be good for our citizens to recall (or learn for the first time) that the United States was the creation of men who believed that each man has the right to do what he wants with his own life as long as he does not interfere with his neighbor's pursuit of happiness."

So as a first offensive play, let's point the finger at those who oppose this measure and demand they explain themselves. Why has smoking something in private been judged a criminal activity? And does pot truly meet the requirements of a Schedule I drug?

1. High potential for abuse? Hardly: while upwards of 42% of American adults have smoked marijuana at least once in their life, less than 1% smoke it on a daily basis. And whereas alcohol is linked to over 75,000 deaths per year, and cigarettes roughly 400,000 per year, the world is still waiting for the first-ever instance of marijuana fatality. This is a drug on which it is impossible to overdose.

Last Updated on Sunday, 30 May 2010 20:06 Read more...
 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  7 
  •  8 
  •  9 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »


Page 1 of 9

Polls

Marijuana Poll
 

Login Form

Statistics

Content View Hits : 75355

Medical Marijuana News

Maternal Tobacco and Alcohol Use, But Not Marijuana, Associated With Psychotic Symptoms In Offspring, Study Says

Wales, United Kingdom: The maternal use of tobacco and alcohol during pregnancy is linked with increased incidences of psychotic symptoms in adolescents, according to the results of a longitudinal study published in the October issue of The British Journal of Psychiatry.

Investigators at the University of Bristol in Great Britain assessed whether maternal use of tobacco, alcohol, or cannabis during pregnancy increased the risk of psychotic symptoms in their offspring. Researchers examined the drug use habits of the mothers of over 6,300 adolescents – approximately 12 percent of which exhibited some symptoms of psychosis.

Authors concluded: "Frequency of maternal tobacco use during pregnancy was associated with increased risk of suspect or definite psychotic symptoms (in offspring.) Maternal alcohol use shows a non-linear association with psychotic symptoms, with this effect almost exclusively in the offspring of women drinking >21 units (approximately a half-pint of beer or a glass of wine) weekly. Maternal cannabis was not associated with psychotic symptoms."

For more information, please contact Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director, at: paul@norml.org. Full text of the study, "Maternal tobacco, cannabis and alcohol use during pregnancy and risk of adolescent psychotic symptoms in offspring," appears in the British Journal of Psychiatry.